The UK government’s May 2025 immigration white paper, which proposes a 6% levy on international student fee income and a reduction in the Graduate Route visa from two years to 18 months, has sparked a wave of concern among international students.
What was introduced as a stabilising measure is being perceived by many as the final blow in a year marked by rising costs, policy restrictions, and eroding post-study opportunities.
“It’s already too much”: financial anxiety and broken expectations
Across online communities and social media, students have voiced fear that this levy will be passed directly on to them through higher tuition fees.
“The 6% levy will likely be passed on to us through higher tuition fees. It’s already expensive enough,” shared one student.
“We invest so much to study in the UK, and now they’re making it harder to stay and work after graduation.”
“Reducing the post-study work visa makes it nearly impossible to gain real work experience. It’s not just the duration — it’s the message it sends.”
Some are rethinking their applications altogether.
“I was considering applying to UK universities, but with these new policies, I’m looking at Canada instead.”
A year of declining trust
The backlash comes after a turbulent 12 months for international students in the UK, marked by abrupt policy shifts and affordability concerns:
- Dependants ban: As of January 2024, most postgraduate taught students can no longer bring dependants, impacting many applicants from India, Nigeria, and Pakistan. Only PhD or research-based students are exempt from this rule.
- Soaring living costs: Students in cities like Glasgow, London and Birmingham have faced private rental increases of 15 to 20% during the 2023–2024 academic year, with average UK rent inflation exceeding 8%.
- Post-graduation barriers: Although the Graduate Route offers two years to stay and work, securing employer sponsorship under the Skilled Worker visa has proven difficult. UK Home Office data shows a 10% drop in Skilled Worker visa applications year-on-year, suggesting limited employer uptake.
- Perceptions of hostility: Public discourse and media narratives have increasingly portrayed migrants, including students, as a burden. Research from the University of Birmingham highlights how such framing shapes public and political sentiment.
- Global comparisons: While the UK tightens access, countries like Canada and Australia have also introduced controls — such as student caps and new work rules — but continue to offer clearer pathways to employment, permanent residency, and family inclusion, particularly for graduates in priority occupations.
“It’s like the UK wants us for our money but not as people,” said one student.
“We came for the education — and stayed for the opportunity. If both are compromised, we’ll go elsewhere,” read a post that gained over 300 upvotes.
Long-term reputational risk
Once a top destination for global talent, the UK is now facing growing scepticism from the very students it relies on. With rising costs, reduced rights, and fewer guarantees after graduation, many students are beginning to question whether the UK still offers a worthwhile return on investment.
Unless these concerns are addressed in both policy and tone, the UK may see not just a dip in enrolments, but a long-term loss of trust among globally mobile students who increasingly have alternatives, and are not afraid to take them.
Written by Varsha Devi Balakrishnan, head of student insight and strategy, Voyage.
The post “We’ll go elsewhere”: int’l students push back on the UK’s proposed fee levy appeared first on The PIE News.